Template Components and Usage

Learn about all the Latest Core components and their respective use.

The Case

Hurricane Michael was a baroclinically initiated hurricane which formed north of the Bahamas in mid-October, 2000. An upper-level low drifted southeastward from the eastern United States and eventually stalled above an old surface frontal zone. The vorticity associated with the upper low eventually made its presence felt at the surface owing to the statically unstable atmosphere. A "subtropical" low formed, with a broad area of gale force winds well displaced from its core. With time, the circulation contracted and convection became better organized over the center. By October 17, the subtropical depression attained status of hurricane Michael.

Analyze the data associated with Michael's progression from the eyes of a Canadian forecaster in the Maritimes region of the Canadian east coast. What aspects of the data would most influence your forecast decisions? How much trust do you place in the NHC forecasts? If you are going to issue a warning, at what point should you do so? What weather elements do you forecast, for what locations, and when? Review the information provided for this case then respond to a series of questions regarding Michael's movement and potential interaction with a nearby mid-latitude trough.

SeaWiFS image of Hurricane Michael's origin as a tropical storm on Wed. 18 Oct 2000

The Set Up

The following information provides insight on the evolution of the sub-tropical depression leading to Hurricane Michael.

Evolution of the subtropical depression as it intensified to become Hurricane Michael

    Date: 15-17 OCT 2000
    Hurricane MICHAEL
    
ADV LAT LON TIME WIND PR STAT 1 30.00 -71.20 10/15/12Z 30 1007 SUBTROPICAL DEPRESSION 2 30.00 -71.50 10/15/18Z 30 1006 SUBTROPICAL DEPRESSION 3 29.90 -71.80 10/16/00Z 35 1005 TROPICAL STORM 4 29.90 -71.90 10/16/06Z 35 1005 TROPICAL STORM 5 29.70 -71.70 10/16/12Z 35 1005 TROPICAL STORM 6 29.80 -71.40 10/16/18Z 35 1004 TROPICAL STORM 7 29.90 -71.10 10/17/00Z 35 1003 TROPICAL STORM 8 29.80 -71.00 10/17/06Z 45 1000 TROPICAL STORM 9 29.80 -70.90 10/17/12Z 55 995 TROPICAL STORM 10 30.10 -70.90 10/17/18Z 65 988 HURRICANE-1

(source: http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/atlantic/2000/MICHAEL/track.dat)

Position of Hurricane Michael 18Z Oct 17 2000

Tropical Storm Advisory and Strike Probabilities

Prior to the upgrading of Michael to hurricane status, the National Weather Service in Miami was already keeping a close eye on the storm.

** WTNT32 KNHC 171431 ***
TCPAT2
BULLETIN
TROPICAL STORM MICHAEL ADVISORY NUMBER 3
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL
11 AM EDT TUE OCT 17 2000 
    
...MICHAEL STRENGTHENING...
INTERESTS IN BERMUDA SHOULD MONITOR THE PROGRESS OF MICHAEL.
AT 11 AM EDT...1500Z...THE CENTER OF TROPICAL STORM MICHAEL WAS LOCATED NEAR LATITUDE 29.8 NORTH...LONGITUDE 71.0 WEST OR ABOUT 405 MILES...650 KM...WEST-SOUTHWEST OF BERMUDA.
MICHAEL HAS BEEN MEANDERING BUT IS NEARLY STATIONARY. A SLOW NORTH- NORTHEASTWARD MOTION IS EXPECTED TO BEGIN DURING THE NEXT 24 HOURS.
MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS ARE NEAR 50 MPH... 85 KM/HR...WITH HIGHER GUSTS. FURTHER STRENGTHENING IS FORECAST DURING THE NEXT 24 HOURS. AN AIR FORCE HURRICANE HUNTER PLANE WILL INVESTIGATE THE STORM LATER TODAY.
TROPICAL STORM FORCE WINDS EXTEND OUTWARD UP TO 45 MILES ... 75 KM FROM THE CENTER.
ESTIMATED MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE IS 1000 MB...29.53 INCHES.
REPEATING THE 11 AM EDT POSITION...29.8 N... 71.0 W. MOVEMENT NEARLY STATIONARY. MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS... 50 MPH. MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...1000 MB.
FOR STORM INFORMATION SPECIFIC TO YOUR AREA...PLEASE MONITOR PRODUCTS ISSUED BY YOUR LOCAL WEATHER OFFICE.
THE NEXT ADVISORY WILL BE ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER AT 5 PM EDT.
FORECASTER PASCH

(source: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2000/prb/LAL1700.003.html)

ZCZC MIASPFAT2 ALL
TTAA00 KNHC DDHHMM
TROPICAL STORM MICHAEL PROBABILITIES NUMBER   3
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL
11 AM EDT TUE OCT 17 2000
    
PROBABILITIES FOR GUIDANCE IN HURRICANE PROTECTION PLANNING BY GOVERNMENT AND DISASTER OFFICIALS
AT 11 AM EDT...1500Z...THE CENTER OF MICHAEL WAS LOCATED NEAR LATITUDE 29.8 NORTH...LONGITUDE 71.0 WEST
CHANCES OF CENTER OF THE STORM PASSING WITHIN 65 NAUTICAL MILES OF LISTED LOCATIONS THROUGH 8AM EDT FRI OCT 20 2000
LOCATION A B C D E LOCATION A B C D E
32.0N 70.0W 41 X X 1 42 BOSTON MA X X 3 6 9 34.0N 69.0W 14 7 2 X 23 PORTLAND ME X X 2 7 9 38.0N 66.0W X 4 11 2 17 BAR HARBOR ME X X 2 8 10 BERMUDA X 3 5 2 10 EASTPORT ME X X 2 8 10 WILMINGTON NC X X 1 1 2 ST JOHN NB X X 2 9 11 MOREHEAD CITY NC X 1 1 1 3 MONCTON NB X X 1 9 10 CAPE HATTERAS NC X 1 4 1 6 YARMOUTH NS X X 3 9 12 NORFOLK VA X X 2 2 4 HALIFAX NS X X 2 10 12 OCEAN CITY MD X X 3 2 5 SABLE ISLAND NS X X 1 9 10 ATLANTIC CITY NJ X X 2 4 6 SYDNEY NS X X X 10 10 NEW YORK CITY NY X X 2 4 6 EDDY POINT NS X X 1 10 11 MONTAUK POINT NY X X 4 5 9 PTX BASQUES NFLD X X X 9 9 PROVIDENCE RI X X 4 5 9 BURGEO NFLD X X X 8 8 NANTUCKET MA X X 6 5 11 ILE ST PIERRE X X X 7 7 HYANNIS MA X X 5 5 10 CAPE RACE NFLD X X X 4 4
COLUMN DEFINITION PROBABILITIES IN PERCENT A IS PROBABILITY FROM NOW TO 8AM WED FOLLOWING ARE ADDITIONAL PROBABILITIES B FROM 8AM WED TO 8PM WED C FROM 8PM WED TO 8AM THU D FROM 8AM THU TO 8AM FRI E IS TOTAL PROBABILITY FROM NOW TO 8AM FRI X MEANS LESS THAN ONE PERCENT
FORECASTER PASCH

(source: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2000/prb/LAL1700.003.html)

Data

The following data becomes available on 12Z on 18 OCT. Compare the position of vorticity maximum at model initialization with the water vapor image for the same time. Follow the vorticity maximum in the model and compare it to the strike probabilities.

GOES-8 Water Vapor image at 12Z 17-18 OCT

GEM Model Run

Updated Strike Probability

ZCZC MIASPFAT2 ALL
TTAA00 KNHC DDHHMM
HURRICANE MICHAEL PROBABILITIES NUMBER   6
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL
5 AM EDT WED OCT 18 2000
    
PROBABILITIES FOR GUIDANCE IN HURRICANE PROTECTION PLANNING BY GOVERNMENT AND DISASTER OFFICIALS
AT 5 AM EDT...0900Z...THE CENTER OF MICHAEL WAS LOCATED NEAR LATITUDE 31.1 NORTH...LONGITUDE 70.8 WEST
CHANCES OF CENTER OF THE HURRICANE PASSING WITHIN 65 NAUTICAL MILES OF LISTED LOCATIONS THROUGH 2AM EDT SAT OCT 21 2000
LOCATION A B C D E LOCATION A B C D E
34.7N 68.5W 41 4 X X 45 EASTPORT ME X X 6 X 6 38.7N 64.5W X 17 6 X 23 ST JOHN NB X X 7 X 7 44.0N 58.5W X X 10 X 10 MONCTON NB X X 7 X 7 BERMUDA X 2 X X 2 YARMOUTH NS X 1 10 X 11 MONTAUK POINT NY X 2 1 X 3 HALIFAX NS X X 11 X 11 PROVIDENCE RI X 2 1 X 3 SABLE ISLAND NS X X 12 X 12 NANTUCKET MA X 4 3 X 7 SYDNEY NS X X 7 X 7 HYANNIS MA X 3 3 X 6 EDDY POINT NS X X 9 X 9 BOSTON MA X 1 2 X 3 PTX BASQUES NFLD X X 4 X 4 PORTLAND ME X 1 2 X 3 BURGEO NFLD X X 3 X 3 BAR HARBOR ME X X 5 X 5 ILE ST PIERRE X X 3 X 3
COLUMN DEFINITION PROBABILITIES IN PERCENT A IS PROBABILITY FROM NOW TO 2AM THU FOLLOWING ARE ADDITIONAL PROBABILITIES B FROM 2AM THU TO 2PM THU C FROM 2PM THU TO 2AM FRI D FROM 2AM FRI TO 2AM SAT E IS TOTAL PROBABILITY FROM NOW TO 2AM SAT X MEANS LESS THAN ONE PERCENT
FORECASTER BEVEN

(source: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2000/prb/LAL1700.006.html)

Guidelines

Guidelines for Forecasting the Interaction of a Tropical System with a Baroclinic Trough

These guidelines have been developed from the study of several trough/tropical system interactions off the east coast of North America.

  1. Diagnose any baroclinic troughs that could potentially interact with the tropical system. Note their characteristics: speed; direction of movement; diffluent/confluent; tilt.
  2. Estimate when the 500mb vorticity maximum associated with the tropical system first encounters the strengthening 500mb flow east of the approaching baroclinic trough.
  3. The beginning of the extratropical transition process (ET) can be considered the approximate time the tropical system becomes absorbed into the 500mb stream.
  4. The speed of the transitioning storm can be estimated by taking 3/4 of the geostrophic wind at 500 mb early in transition to 1/2 late in the transition process.
  5. Deepening of the transitioning system is likely to begin when the approaching baroclinic trough axis moves to within 5° latitude of that system.
  6. The direction of motion of the transitioning system is approximately the same direction as the 500mb wind before deepening and approximately 25° cross-contour towards lower heights during the deepening period.

Questions

Question 1

Consider the mid-latitude trough approaching Hurricane Michael at 12Z 18 OCT.

GEM 0Z 18 OCT

Question 1a

Does this trough appear to be diffluent or confluent?

Select the correct answer.

Yes, it does appear to be diffluent.

No, it appears to be slightly diffluent. Take a closer look at the divergent nature of the isobars to the east of the trough.

Question 1b

Is the "tilt' of the trough favorable for development?

Select the correct answer.

Yes, the trough has negative tilt and is thus favorable for development.

Look again! The trough has negative tilt and is thus favorable for development.

Question 1c

Does this situation appear to be favorable for extratropical transition?

Select the correct answer.

Correct. Diffluent trough, negative tilt, and eastward movement are all conditions favorable for extratropical transition to take place.

Think again! Diffluent trough, negative tilt, and eastward movement are all conditions favorable for extratropical transition to take place.

Question 2

Question 2

At what time does it appear that Michael has become absorbed into the 500mb flow?

Select the correct answer.

No, that is not correct. Try again.

Yes, that is correct. The storm appears to have become absorbed into the 500mb flow around 12H V00Z 19 OCT.

No, that is not correct. Try again.

No, that is not correct. Try again.

Question 3

Forecast Guidelines

Guidelines for Forecasting the Interaction of a Tropical System with a Baroclinic Trough

  1. Diagnose any baroclinic troughs that could potentially interact with the tropical system. Note their characteristics: speed; direction of movement; diffluent/confluent; tilt.
  2. Estimate when the 500mb vorticity maximum associated with the tropical system first encounters the strengthening 500mb flow east of the approaching baroclinic trough.
  3. The beginning of the extratropical transition process (ET) can be considered the approximate time the tropical system becomes absorbed into the 500mb stream.
  4. The speed of the transitioning storm can be estimated by taking 3/4 of the geostrophic wind at 500 mb early in transition to 1/2 late in the transition process.
  5. Deepening of the transitioning system is likely to begin when the baroclinic trough axis moves to within 5° latitude of that system.
  6. The direction of motion of the transitioning system is approximately the same direction as the 500mb wind before deepening and approximately 25° cross-contour towards lower heights during the deepening period.

Rules of Thumb

Rules of Thumb: Estimating 500mb wind from height charts

  1. Measure separation between two height contours 6 dam apart ().
  2. Use the following formula:

x ÷ y° = estimated 500mb wind (knots)

x = factor based on latitude

= separation between two height contours 6 dam apart:

latitude at measurement (°) factor (x)
30 140
35 125
40 110
45 100
50 90

Question 3

Using the 500mb vorticity maximum as a central fix for Michael at 00Z 19 OCT, use the forecast guidelines and the rules of thumb for estimating the 500mb wind from height charts to estimate where Michael will be at 12Z 19 OCT. Click the appropriate longitude/latitude position to check your answer.

question 3

Select the correct answer.

Not quite. 44N 60W places Michael too far north. Try again.

Yes, that is approximately where Michael should end up based on the use of the Forecast Guidelines.

GEM 12H V00Z 19 OCT

No, 39N 58W is not quite where the estimated position of Michael should be based on using the Forecast Guidelines. Please try again.

Question 4

Question 2

At what time does it appear that Michael is within 5° of the trough axis?

Select the correct answer.

No, that is not correct. Try again.

No, that is not correct. Try again.

Yes, at 24H V12Z 19 OCT Michael appears to be within the 5 degree influence of the approaching trough.

No, that is not correct. Try again.

Question 5

Question 5

Is this pattern consistent with ET re-intensification?

Select the correct answer.

Correct, given that the trough-storm seperation is less than 5 degrees and the trough is negatively tilted and "digging," you should expect the storm to deepen.

Look again, given that the trough-storm seperation is less than 5 degrees and the trough is negatively tilted and "digging," you should expect the storm to deepen.

Question 6

Forecast Guidelines

Guidelines for Forecasting the Interaction of a Tropical System with a Baroclinic Trough

  1. Diagnose any baroclinic troughs that could potentially interact with the tropical system. Note their characteristics: speed; direction of movement; diffluent/confluent; tilt.
  2. Estimate when the 500mb vorticity maximum associated with the tropical system first encounters the strengthening 500mb flow east of the approaching baroclinic trough.
  3. The beginning of the extratropical transition process (ET) can be considered the approximate time the tropical system becomes absorbed into the 500mb stream.
  4. The speed of the transitioning storm can be estimated by taking 3/4 of the geostrophic wind at 500 mb early in transition to 1/2 late in the transition process.
  5. Deepening of the transitioning system is likely to begin when the baroclinic trough axis moves to within 5° latitude of that system.
  6. The direction of motion of the transitioning system is approximately the same direction as the 500mb wind before deepening and approximately 25° cross-contour towards lower heights during the deepening period.

Rules of Thumb

Rules of Thumb: Estimating 500mb wind from height charts

  1. Measure separation between two height contours 6 dam apart ().
  2. Use the following formula:

x ÷ y° = estimated 500mb wind (knots)

x = factor based on latitude

= separation between two height contours 6 dam apart:

latitude at measurement (°) factor (x)
30 140
35 125
40 110
45 100
50 90
GEM 24H V12Z 19 OCT

Question 6

Do you anticipate Michael making landfall within this time period?

Select the correct answer.

GEM 24H V12Z 19 OCT

Try plotting your estimated position again. Using the forecast guidelines and the 24H chart to estimate the 500mb wind with a 25 degree cross-contour movement, your estimate should place the storm south of Newfoundland.

In reality however, the storm reached the Newfoundland coast at 22:30Z 19 OCT. Go on to question 7 to find out why.

GEM 24H V12Z 19 OCT

Correct. Using the forecast guidelines and the 24H chart to estimate the 500mb wind with a 25 degree cross-contour movement, the estimated storm position is south of Newfoundland.

In reality however, the storm reached the Newfoundland coast at 22:30Z 19 OCT. Go on to question 7 to find out why.

Question 7

Question 7a

How has the 500mb gradient over the storm changed between 12Z 19 OCT and 00Z 20 OCT?

Select the correct answer.

Yes, the 500mb gradient has strengthened over the storm by about 50 percent.

No, the 500mb gradient has strengthened over the storm by about 50 percent.

Question 7b

How might this change affect your forecast position?


Given that the 500mb gradient has strengthened, you would expect the storm's position to be further north than the rules of thumb would suggest. The storm system had moved well inland by 00Z 20 OCT. It has completed the transiton process to an extratropical system. Note the well defined frontal system and comma cloud pattern evident on the 2315Z 19 OCT Satellite image below.

Summary

At 12Z 18 OCT, Hurricane Michael was situated to the southeast of a diffluent trough over the Great Lakes. By 00Z 19 OCT, Michael encountered the 500mb flow within the trough and began accelerating to the northeast, thus beginning the extratropical transition process. By 12Z 19 OCT, Michael was within 5 degrees latitude of the diffluent trough, moving northeastward near 40 knots and beginning to deepen, consistent with the potential for development diagnoses used for winter storms. Significant deepening occurred during the afternoon of 19 OCT, while Michael continued transitioning into an extratropical storm. The center of this storm made landfall on the south coast of Newfoundland near 2230Z 19 OCT, still undergoing extratropical transition. Michael had both tropical and extratropical characteristics when it made landfall but was categorized as a hurricane by the Canadian Hurricane Center based on surface and radar data, but classified as extratropical by the Hurricane Center in Miami; this illustrates the current lack of understanding of the transition process and the lack of consistent guidelines in classifying these storms. The storm tracking map and data appear below along with an infrared satellite image prior to landfall.

Supporting Data

The Track of Hurricane Michael

This hurricane track chart makes apparent the rapid acceleration that took place after Hurricane Michael entered the 500mb flow late on the 18th, moving more than 15 degrees in 24 hours after being nearly stalled in the days leading up to that time.

Canadian Hurricane Center track for Hurricane Michael
    Date: 15-20 OCT 2000
    Hurricane MICHAEL
    ADV  LAT   LON       TIME     WIND  PR  STAT
      1  30.00  -71.20 10/15/12Z   30  1007 SUBTROPICAL DEPRESSION
      2  30.00  -71.50 10/15/18Z   30  1006 SUBTROPICAL DEPRESSION
      3  29.90  -71.80 10/16/00Z   35  1005 TROPICAL STORM
      4  29.90  -71.90 10/16/06Z   35  1005 TROPICAL STORM
      5  29.70  -71.70 10/16/12Z   35  1005 TROPICAL STORM
      6  29.80  -71.40 10/16/18Z   35  1004 TROPICAL STORM
      7  29.90  -71.10 10/17/00Z   35  1003 TROPICAL STORM
      8  29.80  -71.00 10/17/06Z   45  1000 TROPICAL STORM
      9  29.80  -70.90 10/17/12Z   55   995 TROPICAL STORM
     10  30.10  -70.90 10/17/18Z   65   988 HURRICANE-1
     11  30.40  -70.90 10/18/00Z   65   988 HURRICANE-1
     12  30.80  -70.80 10/18/06Z   65   986 HURRICANE-1
     13  31.50  -70.40 10/18/12Z   65   984 HURRICANE-1
     14  32.60  -69.50 10/18/18Z   70   979 HURRICANE-1
     15  34.20  -67.80 10/19/00Z   75   983 HURRICANE-1
     16  36.30  -65.50 10/19/06Z   65   986 HURRICANE-1
     17  39.80  -61.60 10/19/12Z   75   979 HURRICANE-1
     18  44.00  -58.50 10/19/18Z   85   965 HURRICANE-2
     19  48.00  -56.50 10/20/00Z   75   966 EXTRATROPICAL STORM-1
     20  50.00  -56.00 10/20/06Z   70   966 EXTRATROPICAL STORM-1
     21  51.00  -53.50 10/20/12Z   65   968 EXTRATROPICAL STORM-1
     22  52.00  -50.50 10/20/18Z   60   970 EXTRATROPICAL STORM
    

(source: http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/atlantic/2000/MICHAEL/track.dat)

Summary (continued)

Shifting Wind Pattern

Note in the four plots below how the wind pattern evolves as Hurricane Michael experiences extratropical transition. Early on the 17th, the wind pattern is very symmetrical, relatively small, and the maximum winds surround the hurricane eyewall. By the 18th, The wind pattern has already become slightly asymmetrical and is widening. On the 19th, the winds have extended even more broadly, and the maximum winds are now shifted to the right or east of the hurricane's path. As the storm makes landfall on the 20th, the pattern is at its broadest and is highly asymmetrical, with little of the high winds extending left of the moving storm system.

Water Vapor images at 1215Z from 17-20 Oct

The compact, nearly-symmetrical hurricane initially east of Florida accelerates northeastward and its associated cloud band, represented by the lighter tones, expands and becomes highly asymmetrical during this period. The end result is a system that looks more like a large, mature mid-latitude low, including darker areas of drier, subsident air behind the cold front and curling into the low. This sequence represents the extratropical transition process of Michael.

GOES-8 IR image at 1915Z, 19 Oct

The IR image indicates that the areas of heaviest clouds and rain are shifting to the left side of the extratropical storm's path.

IR satellite image of Hurricane Michael just before landfall on Newfoundland on October 19 2000

More Details

A detailed synoptic history of Michael is available on the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Web site:
https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL142018_Michael.pdf

A technical note, Summary Report and Storm Impact on Canada, by the author of this case exercise is available as a PDF file at:
http://www.novaweather.net/Hurricane_Michael_files/Michael_MSC.pdf

Contributors

COMET Sponsors

  • Meteorological Service of Canada (MSC)
  • National Weather Service (NWS)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

Principal Investigator

  • Chris Fogarty– MSC

Science Advisors

  • Jim Abraham– MSC
  • Peter Bowyer– MSC
  • Steve Miller– MSC

Project Lead/Instructional Design

  • Bruce Muller– UCAR/COMET

Project Meteorologist

  • Peter Lewis– MSC

Multimedia Authoring/Additional Instructional Design

  • Bruce Muller– UCAR/COMET

Computer Graphics/Animation

  • Steve Deyo – UCAR/COMET

Software Testing/Quality Assurance

  • Michael Smith – UCAR/COMET

Copyright Administration

  • Lorrie Fyffe – UCAR/COMET

Data Provided by

  • MSC
  • NWS – NOAA

COMET HTML Integration Team 2020

  • Tim Alberta — Project Manager
  • Dolores Kiessling — Project Lead
  • Steve Deyo — Graphic Artist
  • Gary Pacheco — Lead Web Developer
  • Justin Richling — Web Developer
  • David Russi — Translations
  • Gretchen Throop Williams — Web Developer
  • Tyler Winstead — Web Developer

COMET Staff, Summer 2002

Director

  • Dr. Timothy Spangler

Assistant Director

  • Dr. Joe Lamos

Meteorologist Resources Group Head

  • Dr. Greg Byrd

Business Manager/Supervisor of Administration

  • Elizabeth Lessard

Administration

  • Alfreda Darden
  • Lorrie Fyffe
  • Bonnie Slagel

Graphics/Media Production

  • Steve Deyo
  • Heidi Godsil
  • Seth Lamos
  • Kay Levesque

Hardware/Software Support and Programming

  • Steve Drake (Supervisor)
  • Tim Alberta
  • Dennis Ward
  • Carl Whitehurst

Instructional Design

  • Dr. Patrick Parrish (Supervisor)
  • Dr. Alan Bol
  • Dr. Vickie Johnson
  • Bruce Muller
  • Dr. Sherwood Wang

Meteorologists

  • Dr. William Bua
  • Patrick Dills
  • Doug Drogurub (Student)
  • Kevin Fuell
  • Jonathan Heyl (Student)
  • Dr. Stephen Jascourt
  • Matthew Kelsch
  • Dolores Kiessling
  • Wendy Schreiber-Abshire
  • Dr. Doug Wesley

Software Testing/Quality Assurance

  • Michael Smith (Coordinator)

Systems Administration

  • Karl Hanzel
  • James Hamm
  • Max Parris (Student)

National Weather Service COMET Branch

  • Richard Cianflone
  • Anthony Mostek (National Satellite Training Coordinator)
  • Elizabeth Mulvihill Page
  • Dr. Robert Rozumalski (SOO/SAC Coordinator)

Meteorological Service of Canada Visiting Meteorologists

  • Peter Lewis
  • Garry Toth

Back to Top