2018-11-27 15:49:27

Fun course.

dkcullum 2018-10-23 20:36:27

Simple but helpful material. Helped me better understand how to effectively use visible and IR Goes-16 imagery

2018-09-12 20:38:12

This was very relevant to the field of operational meteorology. I found it interesting and almost feel sorry for GOES 15 b/c I knew 16 was a lot better but the side-by-side comparison really drove the point home.

woodardjen78 2018-05-24 17:05:00

I havent done the quiz yet..but i did the introduction and its very interesting

lumancorp 2018-04-24 21:30:28

It would be niceto have if a link to a youtube video for some examples.

n0xwx 2018-02-19 13:26:20

Very informative. I experienced this weather event from the ground when it occurred. Interesting to go through the information as it related to an event such as this.

ambershearer1996 2018-01-29 18:19:45

none

twshesky@yahoo.com 2018-01-09 19:19:29

I had a little trouble identifying some features like cumulus cloud streets at the beginning. I know you guys showed examples, but some more verbal pointers would have been helpful as well. Otherwise, it was a good exercise.

Julie.Arthur 2018-01-07 21:12:56

A great review on using satellite for convective interpretation! And this lesson really pointed out the advantages of GOES-16 over older satellite technology.

BRCinWX 2018-01-01 13:44:50

This lesson product provides very relevant and enlightened understanding of the vast GOES-16 improvements with both frequency of observations and imagery resolutions (both visible and infrared). While I'm sure we all expected the data products to improve immensely, this lesson package permits the 'player' to compare and contrast with a wonderful real-time weather event.

Stealth Vorticity 2017-12-21 10:27:14

Clearly displays the operational enhancements that GOES-16 (R) provides in comparison with "legacy" GOES satellites. A "must review" for anyone involved in convective forecasting.

frankstrait 2017-12-07 20:27:07

I found the lesson informative and that I didn't know quite as much as I thought I did about convective signatures in satellite imagery.It doesn't really matter much to the lesson but was the GOES-16 imagery presented parallax corrected? Features on it appeared in a different spot than in the GOES-15 imagery that was parallax corrected and that threw me off a little.

JENJACKSON77 2017-12-02 04:49:31

Excellent information

k6vhf 2017-12-01 08:01:03

Help me a lot to understand. Well done course! Thanks.

CeMa 2017-11-30 08:58:04

any

fpena123 2017-11-21 11:52:50

Very informative.

manofmet 2017-11-18 13:12:23

Great module! I would like to see more case example modules with GOES-16 in the future.

shaggy073077 2017-11-11 05:16:38

n/a

2017-11-10 22:39:48

Good

1. Identify common convective development and intensity signatures on longwave IR and visible satellite imagery.
2. Observe the difference in resolution between new GOES-16 and legacy GOES-13/15 visible and infrared imagery, and be able to describe convective signature advantages that GOES-16 provides.

GOES-16, geostationary satellite, convection, enhanced-V, cloud-top cooling, overshooting top, anvil, orphan, hail, severe, storm report, 8 May 2017, resolution, parallax, GOES-R, Denver metro, Colorado, convective weather, GOES, remote sensing, rapid scan imaging, Advanced Baseline Imager, ABI, storm intensification