GFS T170 Grid-Scale Precipitation Bomb during Flood Event in
IA
vs
Abstract
This case discusses one occurrence of a well-known problem with
the GFS; grid-scale precipitation bombs at T170L42 resolution. Anecdotal evidence
suggests that these precipitation bulls'-eyes have been more frequent this warm
season, particularly in the central and northern Plains and Midwest. The time-scale,
spatial scale, and effect of the GFS precipitation bombs on the forecast are
examined. We also discuss whether GFS forecasts that produce such features can
be useful to the operational meteorologist.
Learning objectives
In this case study, the main lessons are:
- Heavy precipitation bulls-eyes result from the inability of the GFS convective
scheme to remove instability in the presence of a deep, conditionally unstable
moist layer. This typically occurs in regions of overrunning during the warm
season, but can occur at all seasons in the proper environment.
- The grid-scale scheme attempts to relieve the instability, resulting in
a grid-scale thunderstorm.
- Latent heating from condensation in deep conditionally unstable layer
results in development of:
- A strong updraft through the depth of the troposphere, with a velocity
maximum at 400-500 hPa and maximum velocity approaching 0.5 ms-1.
- A convergence/divergence couplet vertically straddling the updraft
(from mass conservation). The lower troposphere convergence feeds
additional moisture into the system and maintains instability within
the updraft for extended periods.
- A vorticity maximum develops below the area of maximum vertical
velocity produced by the grid-scale thunderstorm. in response to vertical
stretching of the atmospheric column.
- Large quantities of cloud ice are produced in the upper troposphere,
and heavy grid-scale precipitation occurs in an area a few grid boxes
in size.
- If a grid-scale downdraft can be produced by the precipitation scheme (through
evaporative cooling, for example), then the grid-scale thunderstorm is suppressed.
- The effects of the grid-scale thunderstorm are to:
- Overdevelop or even create spurious frontal waves
- Spin up spurious vorticity maxima in the middle troposphere
- Produce what may be spurious precipitation maxima (or precipitation
maxima through the wrong processes, i.e. through the grid-scale rather
than convective precipitation parameterization).
In going through this case, when you open a separate graphic, an image or loop
will pop up in a separate window. If one is already displaying, it will be replaced
by the one you just selected. Loops automatically start looping. To freeze a
frame, click the Stop button
.
To advance one frame, use the Plus 1 button
.
To resume looping, use the Forward button
.
Loop speed is increased by repeatedly clicking the Fast button
and
decreased by doing the same to the Slow button
.
Credits
by Dr. Bill Bua
Thanks to:
Bill Nichols, lead forecaster at Davenport, IA, for bringing attention to
this case
Mike McClure, forecaster at Davenport, IA for reviewing this case
Stephen Jascourt (for discussions, and review)
START CASE